tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5948141587422980338.post7162470980807709278..comments2023-07-29T14:44:21.646+02:00Comments on The Tester's Headache: Sapient checking?Simon Morleyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10629592766073538811noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5948141587422980338.post-46998042868881599272009-09-16T18:58:42.751+02:002009-09-16T18:58:42.751+02:00Hi Michael,
I browsed the new post last night and...Hi Michael,<br /><br />I browsed the new post last night and thought there some good points to it. Will dig into more...<br /><br />Enjoying the discussion/analysis.<br /><br />Cheers,<br />/SSimon Morleyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10629592766073538811noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5948141587422980338.post-49124473401431260132009-09-16T17:06:21.161+02:002009-09-16T17:06:21.161+02:00Hi, Simon...
The problem with trying to define ch...Hi, Simon...<br /><br /><i>The problem with trying to define checking is that it is so tightly intertwined with testing that I don't think it adds value into the communication about a product or project.</i><br /><br />I've taken a first stab at addressing this issue <a href="http://www.developsense.com/2009/09/elements-of-testing-and-checking.html" rel="nofollow">here</a>, and I'm working on more. I hope you continue to critique the idea. Criticism will strengthen it in the long run.<br /><br />Cheers,<br /><br />---Michael B.Michael Bolton http://www.developsense.comhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09027725699187903416noreply@blogger.com